We use cookies to provide you with an improved user experience and to make ourselves visible to searches. By continuing to use our website, you agree to their use. Click here to Hide.
BREXIT - Britain Riles Liberals for Daring to leave a Trade
Union
Breaking - Catty EU wipes UK's
access to .EU Domain Names
This morning, 1st Jan 2021, any Briton who had planned to work with,
support, trade with countries in the EU, and who had purchased and
paid for an EU domain name to represent themselves in European
Countries, suddenly and summarily found all their .eu
services had vanished. Emails, content held on line, web site data,
completely severed and lost forever.
In a meeting with the team that runs yellings.com, we strove hard to
find how that act benefits anyone, and we could find no reason
whatsoever except this was a spiteful act designed to further
alienate and punish Britons. Here's the facts..
The EU were offering this as a "paid for" service
Only pro EU individuals and businesses would have purchased it
The service was considered to provide Europeans with a
European identity
Britain is still European. We are still all in NATO and
continue to cooperate in many ways
There was agreement
that the domains could be kept if there was a deal
agreed. There was such a deal, and yet the EU have reneged.
This can only alienate any remaining British EU goodwill.
No offer of a refund has been seen for the prepaid portion
(usually billed annually, often purchased in multi-year lumps)
The only possible excuse that they might petulantly provide is that
they want an unambiguous situation where people appearing to be in
the EU are in-fact in the EU, but this is not the normal way of
things in the digital world. International traders procure digital
services within the bloc they wish to trade for the purposes of
identifying what currency they use and demonstrating their
willingness to work within the rules of that bloc. The ruling here
means that contrary to past norms, the EU will not allow you trade
freely with them unless you own property in the EU.
In Summary, why Leavers Left
Not many know:
The EU acts unaccountably, their pay and pension is much more
than UK MPs
The EU funded Ukraine Protesters causing a bloody Revolution
The EU deposed both Italian and Greek MPs
The EU prints for monetary expansion making Greece borrow it
This control of the central bank is the main problem for
Europe
The EU hugely outweighs UK's fishing in its own waters.
The EU want an army.
All Europe & EU's leaders secretly attend the super
wealthy Bilderberg Group
More..
It's not xenophobia when many find pressure on jobs, homes
and culture
The EU is taking power by stealth -- it was supposed to be
just a trade union.
SMEs are
being crushed by red tape - for EU advantage it seems - ie:
EU Corporates now dominate UK service and defense
industries raising prices to tax payer
Our vote for MEPs seems pointless. Leaders are decided
retrospectively.
The UK exits from a Trade Union
Nov 2020 - Yes, Britain is merely exiting from a Trade Agreement.
You wouldn't think it was just a Trade Agreement though... The
remainer elite poured the kind of hatred on it that the Left
liberals reserved for Trump. Leavers were labelled Brextards, Rotten
Kippers (ref UKIP), and Gammon - the latter being a term that was
endorsed for years by the BBC comment section despite multiple
complaints (some by our own team). The remainer elite then crippled
the democratic decision by stalling it over 4 years turning euphoria
into exasperation, anticipation into antipathy.
So why did we leave anyway? Aside the summary preceding, the UK has
been in the grip of a basically unelected quango of bureaucrats,
from both the EU and their UK counterparts, that have
assumed far more power over us than was ever intended. So we voted
to leave in 2016 so we could be free of the excess rules that held
us back that seemed to favor corporations shutting out small
companies, that favored totalitarianism over individual freedom.
Had the EU reformed even a tiny bit, when Cameron gave them chances
in 2016, we'd not be in this position of leaving. The arrogance of
Jean-Claude Juncker, the then president of the EU elected by the EU
chamber and not the people, was such that he told Cameron to go home
(with words to the effect that there will be no more compromise). No
democratically elected leader would talk down with such arrogance
"to his subjects".
EU Decisions, by people with No Accountability, have been ensuring
our farmers, fisheries, and Corporations have been losing viability
and hemorrhaging profits. Individual street traders, the self
employed and small companies, have been driven to the brink of
bankruptcy -- and to the point of madness by the frustration of
being forced to cow tow to ludicrously detailed rules with their
equally crippling punitive fines.
The so called "trade union" that became the EU now wants "political
union" (under them), armies, a superstate, to use red-tape to
destroy our SMEs, to start coups (like they did in the
Ukraine), print Euros & make Greece borrow them, scupper our
fisheries (literally), have "vote now, president later" democracy,
depose PMs, MPs, and usurp our centuries old evolved and tested
laws.
Brexit was our ONE CHANCE to fix the EU and make it an union for the
people, free of it's hegemony roots.
Brexit tames our EU relationship, gives less red tape (meaning more
corporate competition by SMEs, affording EVERY INDIVIDUAL (EU phile
or phobe) a fighting chance at a fulfilling job or business in
future). Even if an individual is in a high powered corporate job,
the EU's crushing of SMEs by red tape means corps' have no
competition, so your job satisfaction is affected -- they have no
need to compete against the private sector potentially paying you
far more, as they have effectively destroyed it.
In Dec 2020, still in the EU, we were imprisoned by the TIMID
turncoats like May and Hammond, the lawless Judges (see below)....
and the chattering left with their "Extend", "Revoke", "Lets
call it off", rhetoric ... too scared to take this opportunity to
fix the EU - so instead, like sheep, the turncoats follow the elites
with their snouts in the EU trough. And those in the UK who wanted
and needed freedom stood by as the turncoats ripped the
British-lion's teeth out, crushing the fervor with which we could
have made Brexit work after a soul destroying 4 year delay.
And if Biden gets to be US president, Britain will not have help
from America in coming to an agreeable alternative union. That said,
the Davos Bilderberg Cabal will then rule the EU and the US with an
iron fist more than ever before, and even if it is a struggle, at
least we will not be slavishly chained to that - we will be free.
So well done Farage, Boris. Despite your careless wobbles, we can
and must stay the course, and we will be free - despite so much
damage done by the treasonous bastards (in that they are not of us,
do not act as in the customs set out by our civilization) from both
the EU hegemony without, and the turncoats within.
Update -- and on Dec 24th, 2020, a deal was done. No one
knows why so many were fixated on a deal, and reading through the
links below added after this date, we still cannot see the point of
a deal. To avoid WTO tariffs? To make European cars cheaper to buy
in the UK? We here at Yellings are glad that for whatever reason,
those obsessed with this deal may find it easier to sleep at nights,
but the main thing is we are now marching towards smaller government
and freedom.
The impact on Scotland
PM David Cameron was a fool .. He illogically precedented the act of voting for Indie (independence) by the incumbents of a region, who have access to, and potential command of, a significant portion of the nation's resources .. as if only those Scots living in Scotland, (at a time when oil was plentiful making them think "cool, we'll be rich"), despite the Scots not even being indigenous, despite the oild belonging to "British Petroleum" (since sold off but still not belonging to the Scots) could vote to split off a landmass that they in fact had invaded? (ie: invaded from Ireland, in 500ad, under King Mor).
But no, Cameron allowed it and by the good intentions of broad minded Scots, they stayed in the UK union. Cameron then got cocky and offered the same the the Falklands Islands -- imagine if the Argentinians had simply offered the farmers there incentives? That was possibly even more moronic than Scot's Indie vote, but once again, sensible people stayed in.
As to Brexit, Cameron then went for strike 3 - had ANOTHER indie vote, but this time his side lost. That said, it was only independence from a trade agreement that was morphing into a political merger, completely without the people's consent or even their knowlegdge. Cameron then ran away like a coward .. and in a biblical betrayal, other key players did the same - (Farage who was a huge advocate, resigned 2 days later, and Boris much later stepped away from leading the Tory party allowing wet wet wet May to stall proceedings for years). It was akin to Moses leading his people out of Egyptian slavery, parting the red sea, and then, halfway across, saying.. "bye!" and letting the sea swallow up the lot of them.
Later, when Boris finally did ascend to power on a landslide (as he promised a swift Brexit re-empopwering the people), Boris showed left wing left wing CINO (conservatives in name only) incompetence. The be fair, Boris appears to be trying to follow through, but as of Dec 20th 2020, the UK is left wondering. The bigger culprit by far for the delays is a cantankerous and and vengeful EU.
So Scotland voted to stay in the EU by a thread, and of course we collectively across the UK including Scotland voted out. This has empowered the nationalists (the Scot Nats) to re-run for Indie. The Spaniards sent in the army when the nationalist Catalonians tried that.
The fallout continues, and now with the possibility of Left Wing Biden, who is part of the left wing cabal intent on big governance and flattening all dissent.
Left Law Exposed
Somehow, left leaning labor (UK spells it labour - equivalent to US
Democrats) law lords are unable to grasp simple logic. When the law
lords start overriding democratic parliamentary decisions, you know
the cart is before the horse. It is parliamentary acts that dictate
law, not the other way around. Here's 2 examples.
Boris used a legal quirk called proroguing to prevent
parliament debating and push through Brexit. Lady Hale and her
overpaid arrogant twerp companions didn't like that, so they
started making the law up as they went along.. Supreme
Court- Suspending Parliament was unlawful, judges rule - BBC
News .. certainly Boris used a legal quirk, and maybe that
wasn't particularly wise or ethical, but it WAS LEGAL!(And this
was the Scottish Supreme Court - it had nothing to do with them
even). Their decision basically comes down to "Suspending
Parliament is illegal if we find it annoying" (to compliment
their last new law which was in effect "Suspending Parliament is
illegal if we find it extreme").
In the US, you same to have the same utter disregard for
protocol, law and democracy by (as I understand it) democrat law
lords ... Fellow
DC Federal Judge Signals Emmet Sullivan May Challenge Flynn
Pardon - essentially A presidential pardon IS A PARDON.
Flynn is not a pawn in some political maneuver perversely
described as a legal move. How deranged are these decision
makers?
Scroll down for fact checking the fact checkers.
--//--
Ah yes, the big red bus -- that labelled Boris the biggest liar in the eyes of the screaming banshees ever heard of.
Here is one of our staffer's letter to the BBC confronting the lies..
(A similar letter was sent to the fact checking site).
Neither got a response.
Dear Sirs....
In the light of the expose of fake news on Swinson's husband today https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-50160148 ,
and noting your invitation "Have you spotted misleading posts? Is there something the team should be investigating?", I would like you to please consider, in the name of fairness and even-handedness, the below story and research.
I quite understand if you don't consider this a story, or feel you cannot publish it, but it would be good to receive a courtesy reply if not.
Yours sincerely,
[name withheld]
Not an Errant Slogan -- In Brief:
The slogan (re subject and above bus video) was not wrong. The EU actually costs us more.
The only fault of thebusslogan is that it says "send" when it should say "pay" (or more accurately, "the EU costs us £350m a week"
Those claiming it was a "pack of lies" etc are themselves misleading the public.
Earlier on this page, it shows "In 2018 the UK's gross contribution to the EU amounted to £20.0 billion;however, this
amount of money was never actually transferred to the EU.It is best thought of as a theoretical liability."
Comparing the value in 2018 to 2015 (from which figures thebusslogan
was calculated on)
See title "The UK contribution over time" ~3/4 way down page).. This graph also shows very approx 15.5b in 2018 v 14.8b in 2015, ie: approx~ 5% less.
That brings us to 384m a week, which is MORE than theBUSSAYS! (this assumes the theoretical liability was proportional, so if we settle for an error margin of 34m or 10%, it is a reasonable conclusion to note that thebusfigure was "basically accurate").
More Research and Detail:
In my research, I found many notable bodies, such as Full Fact, distorting the figures...
brexitbuscampaign -- £350 million EU claim "a clear misuse of official statistics" - Full Fact
TheBusClaim
of costs does not account for the 4.2Bn returned to us by the EU to support various projects and gov departments. However, thebusSlogan
is clearly about "taking back control" and money we send is like a tax.... We don't normally discuss tax as less money returned to us by government services, nor should we expect the slogan to.
What is the UK rebate? - RESEARCH sources:
Is this REBATE because we collect more VAT for the EU? If so, then we have already paid it. The clue is in the word "rebate", and so the slogan is correct to include it.
UK rebate
Calculating
the size of the UK's annual rebate is complex.[9] Broadly, the UK gets back 66% of the difference between its share of member states' VAT contributions and its share of EU spending in return. The European Commission sets out the detailed calculations in a working document.[10]
Full Fact: "Does
the UK pay a fifth of the VAT going into the EU budget?"
Claim
The UK pays nearly a fifth of all VAT going into the EU budget.
Conclusion
The UK is behind a significant share of the VAT revenue flowing into the EU budget. But it makes more sense to look at all contributions rather than a small part; VAT was only 12% of EU revenue in 2014.
(So basically, they agree, minus some in the detail).
Lastly, is theBUSCLAIM ambiguous?
Maybe, but it's a slogan. All campaign slogans are "sound bites".
>
PostScript
My conclusion is that it is not *misleading* unless somehow the fact we don't actually "send" that money but merely "pay" it is anything more than nit-picking.
Money
Sent-Back (4.2bn in 2018) is still a tax that is not in our control.
Money
not included by the accusers is misleading. If thebussaid
"The EU costs us 253m a week", that would have been misleading to Remain's benefit.
Calculations
and PDFs of all main sources available. Figures obtained from graph (described above) were only visually assessed, and error margin included to favour the accusers (as I could not find the original figures). Disclaimer: The evidence supplied needs to be fact checked. No politicians or Media outlets were hurt in the making of this argument. The Tory party is not aware of my research.